|Why did voters in Belarus reject the "Denim Revolution"?|
|| 10-02-2006, 17:11 | Comments: (0) | Categories: Belarus, Elections|
In the presidential election held in Belarus on 19th March 2006 the incumbent Alexander Lukashenko won a convincing 82% victory. This result had been widely predicted as had the international community’s hostile response – in the weeks leading up to the election the main observer mission, the OSCE, prejudged both the conduct and result of the poll, deeming it to be neither free nor fair before a vote was cast.
At first sight, the proportions of Mr Lukashenko’s victory seem barely less grotesque than the stratospherical electoral triumphs of the West’s favourites. Over the last 15 years, the Western-controlled OSCE observer missions have swallowed without demur a 97% victory for the “rose revolutionary” Mikheil Saakashvili in Georgia in 2004 or a modest 89% from Kyrgyzstan’s “tulip revolutionary” Kurmanbek Bakiev, or 92% for Georgia’s Eduard Shevardnadze back in 1992 when he was still Washington’s favourite reformer, or even Heydar Aliev’s 93% in Azerbaijan in 1993. Yet the same team which never raised an eyebrow about elections where one regime insider was endorsed as the successor of a predecessor whom the West had tired of could not conceive that 82% of Belarussians voted for Alexander Lukashenko.
business, Cameron, campaign, communism, crisis, economy, election, elections, Euthanasia, George Bush, government, human rights, independence, Karimov, KFOR, Kosovo, legitimacy, Lukashenko, media, NATO, NGO, parliament, parliamentary elections, parties, party, policy, politics, polling stations, polls, post-communism, president, referendum, refugees, revolution, Saakashvili, senate, Shevardnadze, TRNC, visa regime, voting
Show all tags