


| Events in Andijan: Conclusions |
| HITS: 825 | 24-08-2005, 12:01 | Comments: (0) | Categories: Uzbekistan , PR and human rights, Politics | |
The violent events in Andijan and other parts of Uzbekistan’s Ferghana Valley on 13th May, 2005, attracted worldwide attention. Unfortunately the intensity of the media coverage was not matched by impartial reporting. As in a number of cases over the last 15 years since the Romanian Revolution in 1989, rumours were reported as fact and the more grisly the allegation the more widely it was disseminated. Pundits repeated allegations of dubious origin. Opposition supporters were presented as journalists or experts rather than partisans. Whatever the faults of the government of President Karimov and its forces’ responsibility for casualties on 13th May, the widespread failure of Western media to report a violent jailbreak, the murder of prisoners by insurgents and their use of prisoners as human shields and hostages left foreigners with a one-sided impression of what happened and why it happened. |
|
| Read more |
Cameron, campaign, commissions, communism, crisis, election, elections, Euthanasia, George Bush, government, human rights, immigration, independence, KFOR, Kosovo, Lukashenko, media, NATO, NGO, NGO activists, parliament, parliamentary elections, parties, party, policy, politics, polling stations, polls, post-communism, president, prime minister, referendum, refugees, revolution, Saakashvili, senate, Shevardnadze, society, vandalism, voting
Show all tags